Who are you? Is EVERYTHING about identity politics
Increasingly, every topics circles back to the issue of identity and identity politics. These are useful lens; important things to take into consideration. However, not everything is about identity. Can we transcend? Or can we at least draw a faint line on the ground?
Hi Love,
Who are you?
Who do you belong to?
These questions were posed to me and a group of type A high-achievers. Abstract, philosophical and potentially squishy questions.
Person, places and the issue of identity is picking up momentum and taking up space in our collective consciousness. Within the last ten days, I've had four separate conversations about identity and identity politics.
The interesting thing is that I am both for and against identity. How can something be both true and not true?!
When discussing inequality I believer race and gender are important intersectional factors that are critical to the discourse. A discussion on inequality (in every level) without factoring in the person or the group's race and gender leads us to a Calvinist Republican attitude towards poverty alleviation, i.e., hardwork alone, pull yourself up by your bootstraps kind of policies (it hasn't worked).
At the same time, not every action someone makes is an insult perpetrated based on identity, it can be, but not always. For examples, members of a women group I am part of often interprets everything through a gendered lens. Every slight inflicted is simply because they are a woman; every additional responsibility assigned is because women are often asked to do more (often unpaid).
I wish there is a defined line. Categorical choices for when you are in discussion of XYZ, all aspects of identity is critical and should be considered; and when conversations are about ABC, maybe we should step back from filter everything through the lens of race, gender, class, and etc., and consider it on human grounds first and foremost. The line is faint and the playbook is blank.
What do we do?
Some of the more intriguing ideas that floated across my view this week on the issues of identity include:
1. 9/11 was a defining point in elevating identity and identity politics. (Interesting. I hadn't considered trying to pinpoint a turning point for when we started looking at ourselves and each other through this inflection point.)
2. Identity is so fraught, so impossible to talk about in the current climate, fiction becomes the only safe space for exploration. (I have lots of thoughts on the role of fiction which I'll follow up in another note later).
3. Identity politics is entirely an invention of the US. (I completely disagree with.)
Daughter, American, Woman, Photographer, Nomad, USC Alumni, Expat, Writer, Chinese, Agnostic, Goth, Rebel, Wife, New Yorker, Globe Trotter, EHF Fellow, Creative Director, Taiwanese, Adventurer, Executive Director are only some of the identities that I've worn, discarded and claimed. Yet none of them are my first instinct when someone asks me how I consider myself.
I am me. And I belong to myself.
That is my first answer and the one that feels the most truthful. Every other label, albeit many of them are outside of our control, are like a costume, something we can slip on and off, ever-changing and shifting, depending on the audience.
Who are you, my love? And who do you belong to?
Your Ever Shapeshifting
Charlie
IDEAS YOU CAN STEAL
Instagram fanatics! Buffer introduced a new feature this week where the app will fill out the first comment on a new post for you. What do you mean? Instagram allows for up to 30 hashtags per post, but you don't want all those tags to be in the description of the post ~ it looks sloppy. So, this means you can post the majority of them, say 27 of those relevant hashtags in the first comment section. Now, Buffer will do that for you.
WORTH A READ
Against Identity Politics. The New Tribalism and the Crisis of Democracy
By Francis Fukuyama (Foreign Affairs)
Don't let the title fool you. Fukuyama lays out the wins and fails of identity politics, areas and examples where it was great for propelling the agenda forward: #METOO, Black Lives Matter, and also the shortcomings: the rise popularism worldwide. He also offers some concrete suggestions on what is missing and ways to reframe the conversation going forward.
WANDERLUST
(upcoming) Norway, Thailand, Kurdistan, and Boston. DC has been postponed.
DON'T MISS
Billions (Showtime). It's not a super addictive show, you can pace it out and sometimes that is a great thing. The writing and acting are super solid. It's a great cipher to understand what motivates people.
We are Both Puppet and Puppeteer
Human are great at looking back and identifying the bread crumbs that lead us from A to B but we are terrible at predicting long term massive cultural trends. Why is that? For one thing, we are not engineered that way.
Hi Love,
We watched Lauren Greenfield's documentary, "Generation Wealth" last night. Greenfield and I both lived and worked in LA around the same time. I never found resonance with her work but I was curious as this particular film is a synthesis of a 25-year career, an opportunity to have some reflection.
I found the film depressing.
"Generation Wealth" as the title suggests is a documentary about a generation of that grew up on material excess fueled by reality TV. Lives spent chasing money, fame, attention and a sense of personal worth based on the envy of others.
Forty plus years of vapid excess nothingness lead us to this moment in history, the Trump Presidency as the proverbial cherry on top.
Meanwhile, a counter-culture has been brewing and it's accelerating. Marie Kondo and minimal lifestyle; tiny houses and van life; mediation, wellness, and DMT. Marianne Williamson's bid for president is one of many indications that the counter culture is making a move for the crown to become the dominant culture. And if that's not evidence enough, the wellness industry saw a 12.8% growth from 2015-2017 bringing the market size to $4.2 trillion and growing. Calm, the meditation app has been valued at $250 million dollars.
The materialists are not giving up. They continue to extract value from our personal data with little benefit to us, they commodify and weaponized our attention in a desperate battle to remain relevant and dominant.
It's hard to say who will win this fight. These massive culture shifts are gradual and it takes time (but we are desperate for change now!) and it's worth remembering that the "loser" does not face extinction just less oxygen and capital. Abandoning the remnants of the Gold Standard in 1971 triggered the excess of the '80s, which brought us Trump and his ilk. The crowning of this idiot king has been more than 40 years in the making. The 2008 economic crisis shattered our sense of invincibility and that trauma shaped the worldview for a generation that has finally come of age. Instead of material wealth, we search the globe for one of a kind experiences and attempt to program our days for mindfulness. But these are just the beginning. The pendulum swings every 30-40 years and we are both the puppet and puppeteer.
Humans are not great at these long term trend forecasting. We are good at looking back and see the path that brought us here but seldom are we able to see the whole chess board, be 10-20 steps ahead, and consciously play the game for collective gain.
For starter, humans don't experience time in longitudinally but momentarily. Everything is personal. This is happening to me, now, and we act in reaction to, rarely in response to. We've long given up the ten-year plan because it feels futile. The world is chaotic and technology drives change at a rate we can no longer comprehend. In addition, we are biased towards narratives that are linear, one input for one output, if this then that. Actions have consequences; hard work and will power will always prevail. We select for facts and information that fits our narrative bias and conveniently ignores everything that tells us otherwise. We are not great at holding multiple thoughts in our head at the same time and forget it if these thoughts are in contradiction of one another. We are emotional creatures assuming the fixed framework of robotic logic.
Of course, we didn't see it coming, we weren't designed to.
Irrespective, we are in the middle of it, a seismic shift that will dictate the world order (and maybe even the remaining days of our planet given the dire predictions of climate change) for the next half-century. What will it be? We are both puppet and puppeteer; hopeless and in-control. There is only one thing to do, use the time, nudge the pendulum and build up muscle memories for a future and a culture that we want.
With love,
Charlie
PS. I am not endorsing Marianne Williamson for 2020 but her stump speech is worth watching.
IDEAS YOU CAN STEAL
A chance for some good karma.
There are plenty of resources for starting your start-up but little on how to shut it down. Fill out this survey and share your shut-down experience, wisdom, and insights for those who are in need.
WORTH A READ
Two books caught my attention this week (no, I've not had a chance to read them yet):
How to Disappear: Notes on Invisibility in a Time of Transparency by
Akiko Busch. The jacket blurb: It is time to reevaluate the merits of the inconspicuous life, to search out some antidote to continuous exposure, and to reconsider the value of going unseen, undetected, or overlooked in this new world. Might invisibility be regarded not simply as refuge, but as a condition with its own meaning and power? The impulse to escape notice is not about complacent isolation or senseless conformity, but about maintaining identity, autonomy, and voice.
William Stoner and the Battle for the Inner Life by Steve Almond. Almond is a friend and also one of my favorite authors. I could have sworn I read him saying something to the extent of, in trying to get the world to pay attention to us, we forgot to pay attention to our lives. But, I can't seem to find this "quote" anywhere. Regardless, pre-order, read, and I promise you won't regret it, Almond is that good.
WANDERLUST
(upcoming) Norway, Thailand, and Kurdistan, with DC and Boston, peppered in-between. I know this sounds like heresy but this particular type of travel is a lot less fun and a whole lot of tiring.
DON'T MISS
The opening monologue from The Newsroom, even if you are not an Aaron Sorkin fanatic. It's the vision of America that we all need and simply fantastic.
